Module 2 of 10
Claude.ai — Your Starting Point
confident daily use of the web app. After this module, you'll know how to have genuinely useful conversations with Claude, organise your work, and get consistently good results without wasting messages.
Your First Real Conversation
Let's open claude.ai and actually do something.
If you haven't already, create a free account at claude.ai. Email, Google, or Apple sign-in — any of them work. Takes about a minute.
You'll see a text box. A blinking cursor. This is where most people freeze. "What do I even ask?" Let's skip the existential moment and try something practical.
Think of something you're actually working on right now. Not a test question, not "tell me a joke" — something real. Maybe you're writing an email you've been putting off. Maybe you're trying to understand a concept for work. Maybe you need to summarise a long document.
Here's the difference context makes:
Same task. But the second message gives Claude everything it needs to actually help. No back-and-forth, no "can you make it more casual?" three messages later.
This is the mental model from Module 1 in action. Brief your colleague. Be specific about what "good" looks like.
Why "Be Specific" Is Useless Advice
Every AI guide says "be specific." It's technically correct but practically useless, because nobody tells you what to be specific about.
Here are the four things that actually move the needle. You don't need all four every time — even one or two makes a noticeable difference.
1. Your situation
One line of context about who you are and what you're doing.
"I'm a freelance designer preparing a proposal for a client in the healthcare industry."
Claude immediately adjusts its tone, vocabulary, and assumptions. Without this, it defaults to generic.
2. The real goal
What you actually need, not just the surface-level task. There's usually a goal behind the goal.
"I need to summarise this article" → that's the task.
"I need to summarise this article so I can explain it to my non-technical team in our Monday standup" → that's the real goal.
The second version gets you a summary that's already shaped for your audience.
3. What good looks like
Tone, length, format, style. Anything that helps Claude understand what you'd be happy with.
"Keep it under 200 words, use bullet points, keep the language simple — no jargon."
4. What you've already tried
If relevant. Claude is better at building on your work than starting from scratch.
"Here's my rough draft. The opening feels flat and the conclusion trails off. The middle section is fine."
Claude now knows exactly where to focus.
Projects: Your First Organised Workspace
Once you've had a few conversations, you'll notice a problem: everything is a disconnected chat. Your job application help is mixed in with your recipe ideas and your research notes. There's no structure.
Projects fix this. They're available on all plans, including free, and let you:
- Group related conversations in one place. All your "marketing plan" conversations live together.
- Add persistent instructions. "I'm working on a marketing plan for a software startup targeting small businesses. Budget is $50,000. Timeline is Q2." You write this once. Every conversation in the project starts with this context already loaded.
- Upload reference documents. Drop in your brand guidelines, competitor research, or any document Claude should know about. It'll draw from these in every conversation.
Think of a Project as giving Claude a desk to sit at. Instead of briefing your colleague from scratch every morning, they walk in and their desk already has the brief, the documents, and the context from yesterday.
When to create a project
Don't create one for every little thing. A quick question doesn't need a project. But if you're going to have more than 2-3 conversations about the same topic, a project saves you from repeating yourself — which saves messages, which saves tokens.
Good candidates: a work deliverable you're iterating on, a course you're studying, a writing project, job applications, a research topic.
How to create one
Click "Projects" in the sidebar → "New Project" → give it a name → add instructions and documents if you have them. That's it. Future conversations can be started inside this project.
Artifacts: When Claude Creates Things
Sometimes Claude doesn't just reply with text — it creates something more structured. A document, a piece of code, a diagram, a spreadsheet-like table. These appear in a separate panel on the right side of the screen. Anthropic calls them "artifacts."
You don't need to do anything special to trigger them. When your request calls for a substantial piece of content — a full email draft, a detailed plan, a formatted document — Claude will naturally create an artifact. You can then:
- Copy it directly
- Edit it and ask Claude to refine specific parts
- Download it when relevant
- Iterate on it across multiple messages ("Make the intro more concise," "Add a section about pricing")
The key thing to know: artifacts are your working canvas. They make Claude feel less like a chatbot and more like a collaborator with a shared document in front of you.
Custom Instructions: Teach Claude About You Once
This is one of the most underused features, and it's one of the simplest.
Custom instructions let you tell Claude things about yourself that apply to every conversation. Instead of saying "I'm a marketing professional, keep things concise, use British English" at the start of every chat, you set it once and it's always there.
Go to Settings → Custom Instructions. You'll see a text box. Here's a starter template you can adapt:
Example:
Styles: Quick personality presets
Separate from Custom Instructions, Claude.ai has a Styles feature that controls how Claude responds. You'll find it in the model selector dropdown or in Settings. There are built-in presets:
- Normal — balanced, conversational
- Concise — shorter, direct answers
- Explanatory — detailed, teaching mode
- Formal — professional tone
You can also create custom styles by uploading writing samples — Claude analyses your voice and matches it. If you've ever wished Claude would "write more like me," custom styles are the answer.
Styles and Custom Instructions work together: Custom Instructions tell Claude what you need, Styles tell it how to sound.
Five Prompting Patterns That Cover 90% of Use Cases
You don't need fifty prompting tricks. Five patterns cover 90% of what you'll ever ask Claude to do.
Each one is a structure you can apply to almost any task. Learn these and you'll handle most of what you need from Claude without ever reading another "prompting guide."
| Pattern | Use for | Key instruction |
|---|---|---|
| The Brief | Getting work done | Give context + task + format + existing work |
| The Reviewer | Improving your work | "Suggest specific fixes, don't just point out problems" |
| The Explainer | Understanding something | Tell Claude what you do know, not just what you don't |
| The Brainstormer | Generating options | "For each option, tell me the main trade-off" |
| The Transformer | Converting content | Specify what to keep and what to change |
Pattern 1: The Brief
For: getting work done — drafts, plans, analysis.
"Here's what I'm working on: [context]. I need you to [specific task]. The output should be [format/tone/length]. Here's what I have so far: [existing work, if any]."
This is the workhorse. Module 1's colleague metaphor in action.
Pattern 2: The Reviewer
For: improving something you've already created.
"Here's my [draft/plan/email/code]. Review it for [specific criteria — clarity, tone, logical gaps, grammar]. Be direct about what's weak. Suggest specific fixes, don't just point out problems."
The key instruction is "suggest specific fixes." Without it, you get vague feedback like "the introduction could be stronger." With it, you get "Replace the first sentence with X because Y."
Pattern 3: The Explainer
For: understanding something complex.
"Explain [topic] to me. I have [this level of background]. Use analogies from [domain I know well]. I specifically don't understand [the confusing part]."
Telling Claude what you do know is as useful as telling it what you don't. It prevents Claude from starting at a level that's too basic or too advanced.
Pattern 4: The Brainstormer
For: generating options when you're stuck.
"I'm trying to [goal]. Here are the constraints: [list them]. Give me [number] different approaches. For each one, tell me the main trade-off — what's the upside and what's the risk."
The "trade-off" instruction is crucial. Without it, Claude gives you a list of ideas that all sound equally good. With it, you can actually choose.
Pattern 5: The Transformer
For: converting content from one format/style to another.
"Here's [content]. Convert it to [new format/audience/style]. Keep [what to preserve] but change [what to adapt]. The audience is [who will read it]."
Works for: making a formal report casual, turning meeting notes into action items, adapting a presentation for a different audience, translating technical content for non-technical readers.
Going deeper (if you want to)
These five patterns will cover the vast majority of what you'll use Claude for day-to-day. We deliberately kept this practical rather than technical — you shouldn't need to study "prompt engineering" to get good results.
But Anthropic (the company that makes Claude) publishes their own prompt engineering guide. It goes into things like structuring prompts with XML tags, giving Claude examples of your desired output, and asking it to think step by step through complex problems. It's thorough, it's free, and it's written for a more technical audience.
You don't need any of that to use the five patterns above well. But if you find yourself wanting more control over how Claude responds — or you're curious about what's happening under the hood — that's the place to go. Straight from the source.
When Claude Says "I Can't"
This happens. And it's confusing, because sometimes Claude says "I can't" when it seems like it should be able to help. Let's clarify what's actually going on.
| Reason | What's happening | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Safety boundaries | Claude considers the request harmful | Respect this — these exist for good reasons |
| Knowledge limits | Claude's training data doesn't cover it | Try a different source for very recent or niche topics |
| Misinterpreted request | Claude read your intent differently | Rephrase with more context about your actual goal |
| Overlong input | Too much text at once | Break the document into sections and work through them |
Token-Saving Habits
We covered the basics in Module 1. Here are a few more practical habits, now that you're actively using Claude.
Front-load context, don't drip-feed it. Five short messages cost more tokens than one well-structured message. And they get worse results.
Use Projects for recurring work. The context you set in a project loads once and applies everywhere. Without it, you're spending tokens re-explaining yourself.
Set custom instructions. Same principle — context that loads automatically instead of you typing it each time.
Say "stop" when you have enough. If Claude is generating a long response and you already have what you need, you can stop generation. Tokens are consumed as they're generated — stopping early saves the remainder.
Keep conversations going instead of starting new ones. Claude maintains context within a conversation. Starting fresh means re-establishing everything from zero.
None of these require you to think about tokens while you're working. Set them up once, and they quietly keep your usage efficient in the background.
You can stop here. With Modules 1 and 2, you have a solid foundation for using Claude.ai in your daily work. The five patterns, custom instructions, and Projects are enough to make Claude genuinely useful — not in a theoretical "AI can do amazing things" way, but in a practical "this actually saved me an hour today" way.
Module 3 introduces Claude Code — the tool that lets Claude work directly with your files and projects. It's more powerful, but it's also a bigger step. Take it when you're ready.